A Banner Day for Literary Birthdays:
Dylan Thomas, Sylvia Plath, Maxine Hong Kingston and Zadie Smith. All born on this day (via The Writer’s Almanac)
Dylan Thomas, Sylvia Plath, Maxine Hong Kingston and Zadie Smith. All born on this day (via The Writer’s Almanac)
Sometimes I’m amazed people still read this thing looking for book recommendations because lately I’ve sucked at posted about what I’ve read. Like really sucked up the joint.
Here’s the catchup, all in one place…
Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro
A lovely sad, poetic character study. Makes you want to cry and sigh deeply. Then call your best friends because life is too short not to.
Instant Love by Jamie Attenberg
Quick read, debut novel. Seems like chick lit at first sight but is really quite sad and tragic by the end. More about how expectations and fantasy can blind us to our own happiness.
Post-Soul Nation by Nelson George
1980s, black culture, the topic’s like friggin catnip to me. I also liked George’s use of a calander as an organizing principle. Not as intellectually rigorous as hist seminal “Hip Hop America” and but if you look past the bluster and bragadoccio, there’s a solid document of a decade there.
“Talking Right” by Geoffrey Nunberg
Perhaps the densest book I’ve read this year. Nunberg has done maybe 15 years worth of research for this barely 250 pages volume and dragged in a bibliography that would humble Harold Bloom. It’s great stuff that bears multiple rereadings, especially since Nunberg tries to outfancy his subjects at times, much to books detriment. Overall, though, it’s a juicy, thoughtful look at where the Democrats stumble on framing political debate, where Republicans succeed and how that imbalance can be corrected.
All caught up now….
Do you know Miss Snark? Because if you have any interest in publishing a book some bright day in the future, you should. Miss Snark is the Howard Cosell of literary agents. She’s both in the business of telling it like it is and being scremingly funny and yet erudite while doing it. I’ve never seen photos but I’m guessing she’s kinda sexy too.
I never wanted to get with Howard Cosell (don’t do cigars) but Miss Snark? Perhaps if we met in a darkened book during BEA and she had a thing for geen-eyed yids with Irish first names?
Yes, lets make that happen.
So when you see an article titled “iPod: I love you, you’re perfect, now change”, is your first instinct to self-induce an epileptic seizure? Because mine is.
But a funny thing happened on the way to the twitching wildly on the floor. I read this piece (by the often perceptive Farhad Manjoo) and was quite impressed. Posing as a review (really a sideways poking at but who’s counting?) of Steven Levy’s new book “The Perfect Thing: How the iPod Shuffles Commerce, Culture and Coolness” Farhad wings in one layered observations after another, pointing out his own biases yet maintain a rigid curiousity.
Witness:
So you come to Levy’s book with justified fear that this is going to be a valentine, one whose depth of feeling threatens to turn embarrassing. There’s not only the hagiographic title but also the book cover, which mimics the look of the iPod, and the flow of the text itself: In order to “spiritually link my book to its subject,” Levy has written a collection of free-standing pieces, allowing every copy to have a different — that is, “Shuffled” — arrangement. By the time you learn this, you’re quite prepared for Levy to divulge that he’s also named his kids Mini and Nano, so far does his iPod lust seem to go. You want to tell him to take his Shuffle and get a room.
And on himself…
Neither of these problems frustrate the iPod-loving hordes very much, and Levy doesn’t address them in his book. I suspect a more widespread issue, though, has to do with the way the iPod seems to work against listening to new music, which has become my chief complaint about the machine. Like many others in the so-called iPod generation, years of surfing the Web have reduced my attention span to not much more time than the length of a typical YouTube clip; consequently, my iPod, stocked with 4,124 songs, routinely turns me into a hyperactive freak show. If you have an iPod, I’m sure you know what I mean. You put on something that you’ve been wanting to listen to all day. Lucinda Williams’ “Car Wheels on a Gravel Road” album, say. But you’re three-quarters of the way through the first track, and even though you’re really digging it, something about the scratchiness of Williams’ voice reminds of something else entirely — the Carter Family. And, hey, don’t you have a copy of “Wildwood Flower” on here? Why, yes, you do. So you switch. But of course, putting on the Carter Family is going to remind you of Johnny Cash. And you have the feeling that you must, just this minute, play Cash’s version of “In My Life” now. So you switch again. But you’re a minute into Johnny and you start to wonder about the Beatles’ original version of the track…
This is a great piece about a subject I could never hear about again and be delighted. Well done, Mr. Manjoo. Now please, use whatever influence you have to get Mr. Jobs on iPod: The Next Generation.
This is one of the most clever bits I’ve ever seen. How many of these album covers do you remember? (via Waxy.org)
And speaking of self-immolation, how about reading all of the Enron email between 1999-2002? (via Sam Felder).
It’s such a crime that Drive in Theater.com, “Dedicated to the keeping the American drive-in alive” is possibly the ugliest website in creation.
This from my friend Min Jung….
My personal relationships are not for public consumption or broadcast. There’s no PR in my romances. I find it horrifically offensive when people put broadcast spin of a web 2.0 nature on their personal relationships. That, I find really gross.
For instance, I received a sms msg via Dodgeball from someone I know stating “@ a very romantic place! having a brilliant conversation with my amazing boyfriend” To which I thought the following:
a) But not saying where you’re at, you kinda defeat the purpose of using dodgeball for its intended purpose
b) if the conversation is so brilliant, why are you dodgeballing in hoping someone will track you down to join you?
c) how amazing is it that this social utility, dodgeball, has been tweaked for such anti-social behavior
d) ok. you guys are squishy. we get it. now can we move on with our lives because the rest of the world really really isn’t that interested in your love life. i mean, it’s not like you’re tom cruise and katy holmes. and even them – i don’t really care much about. Not even in that (and don’t draw parallels here) train-wreck kinda way.
Yes, yes, yes and one second, yes. I do not use new media to broadcast who I’m dating or involved with because
A) It’s no one’s business.
B) I have a little dignity and thinking that the world needs to know everything I’m up to says more about my insecurity than it does about The Power of Technology or anything mythic and imaginary like that.
C) I still believe I exist even if no one flickrs/tags/dodgeballs/blogs/podcasts my wheelings and dealings.
D) If I don’t or if you don’t, I’m yanking the plug on (y)our hyperconnected lives right now and forcing you/us to communicate through a tin can telephone.
Twitterpated: adj. Confused by affection or infatuation.
First used in the movie Bambi. Suggested by my friend Jenny.